About Us
Connecting to Asian Air Sensors...
Research Watch
Research Watch

Silent Suffering: Why Nepal’s Doctors and Nurses Are Not Reporting Child Abuse

BySamina Dhital, BSW,LLM, MA Health Advocacy Reviewer, Legal Scholar, and Social Work Professional
Published March 13, 2026Updated March 13, 2026

KATHMANDU – Child abuse is a heavy word that many in Nepal prefer to whisper rather than speak aloud. While our Constitution and laws strictly ban all forms of violence against children, the reality inside our homes and schools is often very different. A recent landmark study has finally shed light on what our healthcare professionals—the very people we trust to save our children—actually know and do when they see a child in pain.

The research, titled "Assessment of the Knowledge, Awareness and Attitudes Regarding Child Abuse and Neglect Among Healthcare Professionals of Nepal," was published in the international journal Child Abuse Review. The findings are a wake-up call: while our doctors and nurses have the right heart and good knowledge, they are struggling to take the final, necessary step of reporting abuse to the authorities.

 

How was the research done?

To understand the situation, a team of researchers led by Dr. Ram Hari Chapagain conducted a "cross-sectional study" between September and November 2024. This means they took a snapshot of the current situation by talking to professionals across the country.

They reached out to 370 healthcare workers, including pediatricians (child doctors), medical officers, nurses, and school health nurses. Because it is hard to visit every hospital in Nepal, they used the internet—sending out structured questionnaires through Google Forms, email, and social media like Facebook and WhatsApp.

Most of the people who took part were women (71%) and worked in large "tertiary" hospitals in cities, particularly in the Bagmati Province. The researchers asked them about their understanding of child rights, how to spot signs of abuse, their personal beliefs about discipline, and whether they had ever actually filed a report for a child they suspected was being harmed.

 

The findings: A gap between heart and action

The results show a confusing picture of "high knowledge" but "low action."

1. Good Knowledge and Positive Attitudes: The study found that 56.2% of professionals had high knowledge about child abuse. Almost everyone (96%) knew that abusers aren't always strangers—they can be parents, teachers, or even siblings. Even better, 87.3% held positive attitudes toward protecting children. They strongly believe that physical punishment, like hitting or denying food, is wrong.

2. The Confidence Crisis: Here is where the trouble begins. Even though they know hitting is wrong, only 5.1% of these professionals felt highly confident in their ability to recognize the physical signs of abuse. If a doctor is not 100% sure that a bruise is from a fall or a hit, they often stay silent.

3. The Reporting Silence: The most shocking discovery was that only 13.5% of healthcare workers had ever reported a suspected case of abuse. Even fewer—just 12%—had ever written it down in a child’s medical record. This means that for every 10 children who might be suffering, only one or two are getting the help that requires a formal report.

 

Were there any gaps in the research?

While this study is very important, it did not cover everything. Like any research, there were parts that were missed or neglected:

  • The "City Bias": Most of the participants were from Bagmati Province and worked in big city hospitals. We still don't know enough about the attitudes of health workers in remote villages where children are even more vulnerable.
  • The "Good Student" Effect: Since this was a self-reported survey, people might have given the "correct" answer to look good. In a real hospital room, their actions might be different from their survey answers.
  • Missing Voices: The study only talked to health workers. It did not include the perspectives of police, teachers, or social workers, who are also part of the team needed to save a child.
  • Lack of Real-World Proof: The researchers did not look at actual hospital records to see if abuse was being missed; they relied only on what the professionals remembered.

 

Why does this matter?

This research matters because child abuse in Nepal is often like an "iceberg"—we only see the tiny tip that arrives at the hospital, while the rest remains hidden in society.

When a healthcare professional fails to report abuse, the child is often sent back to the same dangerous home. An abused child has a 50% chance of being hurt again and a 10% chance of dying if the abuse is not stopped the first time they see a doctor. Abuse also leads to long-term mental health problems like anxiety, depression, and even suicide. If our frontline workers are too afraid or unsure to report, these children have no way out.

 

The Takeaway: What can we learn?

The big lesson is that "knowledge is not enough." Just because a doctor knows that abuse is a crime doesn't mean they know how to handle the police or the parents.

The study found that training is the key. Professionals who received specialized training were nearly four times more likely to report abuse than those who had no training. Training gives them the "bravery" and the tools to act on what they know.

 

Suggested Policy: The Way Forward

Based on these findings, it is clear that Nepal needs more than just laws—we need a system that supports our health workers. Here is what should happen:

  1. Mandatory Training: The government must make "Child Protection Training" a requirement for every doctor and nurse to keep their license.
  2. Clear Rules (SOPs): Every hospital should have a simple, step-by-step guide (Standard Operating Procedure) on who to call and what form to fill out when abuse is suspected.
  3. Hospital Specialists: Major hospitals should have a Child Protection Focal Point—a specific person who handles these cases so the doctor doesn't have to feel alone in the process.
  4. Protection for Reporters: We must ensure that health workers who report abuse are legally protected from being sued or harassed by angry families.
  5. Better Tools: Use simple checklists (standardized screening tools) during every child’s check-up to make sure signs of abuse aren't missed.

Our children deserve to be safe, and our healthcare workers want to protect them. Now, it is time for the government to give them the training and the systems to turn their positive attitudes into life-saving action.

 

References (3)
  1. Chapagain, R. H., Adhikari, S., Bhattarai, T., Pandey, A., Ma, J., Acharya, J., Upadhayay, D., Bhatt, L. R., & Sharma, S. (2026). Assessment of the knowledge, awareness and attitudes regarding child abuse and neglect among healthcare professionals of Nepal. Child Abuse Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.70115
  2. Nepal, D., Dhakal, A., Banstola, D., & Mahaseth, C. (2010). A typical case of child abuse: A case report. Journal of Nepal Paediatric Society, 30(1), 53–56.
  3. Sah, R., Brøndbo, P. H., Ma, J., Hansen, K. L., Devkota, N., Handegård, B. H., & Javo, A. C. (2025). Prevalence of violence in a clinical sample of adolescent

Share this article

About the Author
Written By
Samina Dhital
Samina Dhital, BSW,LLM, MA
Health Advocacy Reviewer, Legal Scholar, and Social Work Professional

Expert in health advocacy and child welfare. With degrees in Law, Rural Development, and Social Work, she specializes in bridging the gap between national health policy and community-level implementation. A specialist in IECD (Early Childhood Development) and trauma-informed advocacy, Samina is dedicated to ensuring that marginalized groups have equitable access to health benefits and social protections through the lens of social work ethics and legal rights.

Full Bio & Articles

Related Content