About Us
Research Watch
•स्क्रिनमा देखिने चुरोट: सुर्तीजन्य हानि न्यूनीकरण नीतिमा दक्षिण एसियाले अझै के छुटाइरहेको छ•नेपालमा पिसाब नलीको संक्रमण र एन्टिबायोटिक प्रतिरोधको बढ्दो संकट•Frontline Perspectives on Nursing Leadership in Nepal•Protecting the Smallest Lungs from the Hidden Grip of RSV in Kathmandu•The Heavy Burden of Bullying on Student Wellbeing in Nepal•The Emerging Landscape of Thyroid Health in Central Nepal•How a Recent Western Nepal Study is Redefining Anemia Diagnosis•How H. Pylori is Impacting the Health of Karnali’s High-Altitude Communities•Sweet Poison, Bitter Reality: The Unseen Diabetes Epidemic Among Nepal’s Youth•How Missing Checklists and Protocols are Costing Lives in Nepal’s ERs•स्क्रिनमा देखिने चुरोट: सुर्तीजन्य हानि न्यूनीकरण नीतिमा दक्षिण एसियाले अझै के छुटाइरहेको छ•नेपालमा पिसाब नलीको संक्रमण र एन्टिबायोटिक प्रतिरोधको बढ्दो संकट•Frontline Perspectives on Nursing Leadership in Nepal•Protecting the Smallest Lungs from the Hidden Grip of RSV in Kathmandu•The Heavy Burden of Bullying on Student Wellbeing in Nepal•The Emerging Landscape of Thyroid Health in Central Nepal•How a Recent Western Nepal Study is Redefining Anemia Diagnosis•How H. Pylori is Impacting the Health of Karnali’s High-Altitude Communities•Sweet Poison, Bitter Reality: The Unseen Diabetes Epidemic Among Nepal’s Youth•How Missing Checklists and Protocols are Costing Lives in Nepal’s ERs

Efficacy and specific toxicity profiles of GPRC5D- versus BCMA-targeted bispecific antibodies in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of clinical trials and real-world studies.

Researchers

Jiahao Ji, Xinyu Zhao, Bin Wang, Jiayu Li, Fangliang Zhou

Abstract

Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) experience poor outcomes following multiple lines of therapy. Available evidence has largely pooled disparate immunotherapy platforms. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to describe, separately by target, the efficacy and toxicity spectra of BCMA×CD3-directed, GPRC5D×CD3-directed, and dual-target bispecific antibody therapy in RRMM, in order to inform toxicity monitoring and supportive-care planning. The Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and PubMed were systematically searched up to January 28, 2026, to identify clinical trials and real-world studies evaluating GPRC5D×CD3 or BCMA×CD3 bispecific antibodies and their combinations for RRMM. Methodological quality was appraised with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies. Proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled utilizing fixed-effects or random-effects models in R, selected according to heterogeneity. Twenty-seven studies-comprising 13 single-arm clinical trials and 14 real-world investigations involving 4,045 patients-met the inclusion criteria. The pooled objective response rate (ORR) for bispecific antibodies in RRMM was 65.54%. Target-stratified subgroup analysis yielded an ORR of 78.51% for GPRC5D×CD3 combined with BCMA×CD3, 69.67% for GPRC5D×CD3 alone, and 60.85% for BCMA×CD3 alone. The pooled minimal residual disease-negativity rate was 23.6%. Regarding safety, distinct antigen-specific toxicity spectra emerged across different targets. The BCMA×CD3 group exhibited elevated incidences of any-grade infection (56.37%) and grade 3-4 infection (26.37%), accompanied by pronounced hematological toxicity. The GPRC5D×CD3 group was characterized by epithelium-related toxicity: the incidence of grade 1-2 taste-related changes was 69.89%, that of any-grade nail-related adverse events (AEs) was 42.33%, and that of any-grade non-rash skin-related AEs was 58.3%; however, grade 3-4 nail-related AEs reached only 0.21%, and grade 3-4 non-rash skin-related AEs reached only 0.33%. The dual-target group bore a substantial burden of infection (84.53%) and hematological toxicity. Bispecific antibodies demonstrate clear antimyeloma activity in RRMM. BCMA×CD3-directed therapy is mainly related to infection and hematological toxicity, whereas GPRC5D×CD3-directed therapy is distinguished by epithelium-related toxicity, although severe events are rare. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ identifier, CRD420261296139.
Source: PubMed (PMID: 42871283)View Original on PubMed