About Us
Research Watch
•स्क्रिनमा देखिने चुरोट: सुर्तीजन्य हानि न्यूनीकरण नीतिमा दक्षिण एसियाले अझै के छुटाइरहेको छ•नेपालमा पिसाब नलीको संक्रमण र एन्टिबायोटिक प्रतिरोधको बढ्दो संकट•Frontline Perspectives on Nursing Leadership in Nepal•Protecting the Smallest Lungs from the Hidden Grip of RSV in Kathmandu•The Heavy Burden of Bullying on Student Wellbeing in Nepal•The Emerging Landscape of Thyroid Health in Central Nepal•How a Recent Western Nepal Study is Redefining Anemia Diagnosis•How H. Pylori is Impacting the Health of Karnali’s High-Altitude Communities•Sweet Poison, Bitter Reality: The Unseen Diabetes Epidemic Among Nepal’s Youth•How Missing Checklists and Protocols are Costing Lives in Nepal’s ERs•स्क्रिनमा देखिने चुरोट: सुर्तीजन्य हानि न्यूनीकरण नीतिमा दक्षिण एसियाले अझै के छुटाइरहेको छ•नेपालमा पिसाब नलीको संक्रमण र एन्टिबायोटिक प्रतिरोधको बढ्दो संकट•Frontline Perspectives on Nursing Leadership in Nepal•Protecting the Smallest Lungs from the Hidden Grip of RSV in Kathmandu•The Heavy Burden of Bullying on Student Wellbeing in Nepal•The Emerging Landscape of Thyroid Health in Central Nepal•How a Recent Western Nepal Study is Redefining Anemia Diagnosis•How H. Pylori is Impacting the Health of Karnali’s High-Altitude Communities•Sweet Poison, Bitter Reality: The Unseen Diabetes Epidemic Among Nepal’s Youth•How Missing Checklists and Protocols are Costing Lives in Nepal’s ERs

Sleep-disordered breathing in children with class II and large overjet treated with removable functional appliance - A longitudinal study.

Researchers

Camilla Hansen, Agneta Markström, Liselotte Sonnesen

Abstract

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) was examined in children aged 9-14&#x2009;years with class II and large overjet&#x2009;&#x2265;&#x2009;6&#x2009;mm (study group) before (T0), during (T1) and after treatment (T2) with a removable functional appliance, compared to a control group. At T0, the study group included 37 children, and the control group included 32 children. For both groups, exclusion criteria were as follows: diseases, syndromes, allergies, asthma, mouth breathing, adenoid vegetations, and hypertrophied tonsils. SDB was assessed and scored manually by respiratory polygraphy. SDB parameters between the groups were compared using a general linear model adjusted for sex, treatment time, and body mass index. No significant difference in SDB was found between the groups (<i>p</i>&#x2009;=&#x2009;.258), although at T0, 8.6% of the children in the study group and none in the control group had SDB. None were diagnosed with SDB at T1 or T2. No significant differences in changes in SDB parameters between the groups were observed from T0-T1, T1-T2, or T0-T2. At T0, 8.6% of study group children had SDB but none at T1 or T2. No significant difference in changes in SDB parameters over time was found between the groups. NCT04964830.
Source: PubMed (PMID: 42831281)View Original on PubMed