About Us
Research Watch
स्क्रिनमा देखिने चुरोट: सुर्तीजन्य हानि न्यूनीकरण नीतिमा दक्षिण एसियाले अझै के छुटाइरहेको छनेपालमा पिसाब नलीको संक्रमण र एन्टिबायोटिक प्रतिरोधको बढ्दो संकटFrontline Perspectives on Nursing Leadership in NepalProtecting the Smallest Lungs from the Hidden Grip of RSV in KathmanduThe Heavy Burden of Bullying on Student Wellbeing in NepalThe Emerging Landscape of Thyroid Health in Central NepalHow a Recent Western Nepal Study is Redefining Anemia DiagnosisHow H. Pylori is Impacting the Health of Karnali’s High-Altitude CommunitiesSweet Poison, Bitter Reality: The Unseen Diabetes Epidemic Among Nepal’s YouthHow Missing Checklists and Protocols are Costing Lives in Nepal’s ERsस्क्रिनमा देखिने चुरोट: सुर्तीजन्य हानि न्यूनीकरण नीतिमा दक्षिण एसियाले अझै के छुटाइरहेको छनेपालमा पिसाब नलीको संक्रमण र एन्टिबायोटिक प्रतिरोधको बढ्दो संकटFrontline Perspectives on Nursing Leadership in NepalProtecting the Smallest Lungs from the Hidden Grip of RSV in KathmanduThe Heavy Burden of Bullying on Student Wellbeing in NepalThe Emerging Landscape of Thyroid Health in Central NepalHow a Recent Western Nepal Study is Redefining Anemia DiagnosisHow H. Pylori is Impacting the Health of Karnali’s High-Altitude CommunitiesSweet Poison, Bitter Reality: The Unseen Diabetes Epidemic Among Nepal’s YouthHow Missing Checklists and Protocols are Costing Lives in Nepal’s ERs

Effect of scenario-based simulation on students' learning outcomes and satisfaction in perioperative anaphylaxis: a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Researchers

Xiuli Yang, Hui Jiang, Huan Wang, Lixia Wang, Lijian Chen

Abstract

Perioperative anaphylaxis is a rare but complex clinical crisis, with outcomes heavily dependent on prompt and effective management by anaesthesiologists. However, evidence supporting the efficacy of scenario-based simulation (SBS) training in perioperative anaphylaxis management remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of SBS versus video-based training (VBT) on learning outcomes and satisfaction among undergraduate anaesthesia students. In this prospective randomised study, 84 fourth-year anaesthesia undergraduate students from Anhui Medical University were assigned to either SBS or VBT for perioperative anaphylaxis education. Knowledge assessments were conducted before (pretest) and after (post-test) training. Outcomes included post-test scores, student satisfaction (assessed via a 5-point Likert scale) and performance in a simulated clinical scenario 1&#x2009;week later. Scenario performance was evaluated using a technical checklist and the Anesthesiologists' Non-Technical Skills scoring system. Baseline characteristics (age, sex and pretest scores) were comparable between groups. The post-test scores were higher in the SBS group than those of the VBT group (80.0 (73.7<b>-</b>85.0)&#x2009;vs 70.0 (65.0<b>-</b>75.0), respectively, p&lt;0.001). Both groups improved in post-test scores after training. The SBS group's post-test score increased significantly more than that of the VBT group (39.2% (30.7%<b>-</b>44.6%)&#x2009;vs 16.6% (8.3%<b>-</b>20.0%), respectively, p&lt;0.001). In the simulation scenario test, the SBS group outperformed the VBT group in both technical (33.5 (31.0-36.0)&#x2009;vs 28.0 (26.0-30.0), p&lt;0.001) and non-technical skills (47.5 (44.0-51.0)&#x2009;vs 43.0 (42.0-48.0), p=0.002). SBS demonstrates greater efficacy than VBT in improving anaesthesia students' learning outcomes, including technical and non-technical skills in managing perioperative anaphylaxis, with higher student satisfaction.
Source: PubMed (PMID: 42601170)View Original on PubMed