Development and validation of a risk-stratification model for individualized management of leptomeningeal metastases in EGFR- mutant NSCLC (LM-Index).
Researchers
Yingxi Wu, Haiyang Chen, Yufeng Wu, Qi Zhao, Xuan Wu, Yuhua Zhao, Lanwei Guo, Huiying Li, Wanwan Cheng, Longfeng Zhang, Weiran Xu, Lili Wang, Zhen He, Sen Yang, Cuicui Zhang, Shuxiang Ma, Peng Li, Xiaoyan Li, Haipeng Xu, Shencun Fang, Zhenyu Yin, Qiming Wang
Abstract
Prognosis for patients with EGFR- mutant non-small-cell lung cancer and leptomeningeal metastasis is highly uncertain, complicating treatment decisions. We aimed to develop and validate a multimodal risk score for predicting overall survival to enable risk-stratified management. In this retrospective, multicenter study, a derivation cohort (n = 350) and an independent external validation cohort (n = 302) were used. Independent prognostic factors were identified via Cox regression and integrated into an integer-based risk score. Model performance was evaluated by the C-index, calibration, and decision curve analysis. Multivariate analysis identified five independent predictors of poorer OS: ECOG PS ≥ 3, brain metastasis, meningeal enhancement on MRI, positive Cerebrospinal Fluid cytology (CSFC) and intracranial pressure > 220 mmH<sub>2</sub>O. The resulting risk score stratified patients into low-risk and high-risk groups, with median OS of 22.6 months versus 9.9 months, respectively (p < 0.001). The model demonstrated good discrimination, with a bias-corrected C-index of 0.73. In the external validation cohort, all factors remained significant, and the model maintained consistent performance (C-index = 0.71). The model showed good calibration and positive net benefit. We developed and validated a robust, clinically accessible risk score that accurately stratifies OS in patients with EGFR- mutant NSCLC and LM. This practical tool facilitates risk‑stratified patient counseling and may aid in the design of future clinical trials.Source: PubMed (PMID: 42501706)View Original on PubMed