Patient-reported outcomes from the TBCRC 022 study of neratinib and ado-trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases.
Researchers
Thomas Grinda, Hillary M Heiling, Nabihah Tayob, Karen L Smith, Raechel Davis, Christine Cotter, Michelle K DeMeo, Cesar A Santa-Maria, Catherine Van Poznak, Beverly Moy, Adam M Brufsky, Michelle E Melisko, Ciara C O'Sullivan, Claudine Isaacs, Yasmeen Rauf, Julie R Nangia, Robyn T Burns, Jennifer Savoie, Antonio C Wolff, Eric P Winer, Erica L Mayer, Sara M Tolaney, Mothaffar F Rimawi, Kathryn J Ruddy, Gabrielle Rocque, Ian E Krop, Nancy U Lin, Rachel A Freedman
Abstract
In TBCRC 022 (NCT01494662), neratinib and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) demonstrated intracranial activity among patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases. However, gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities-particularly diarrhea-were common, potentially impacting quality of life. Clinician-reported adverse event (CTCAE) grading may underestimate the patient experience. We report GI toxicities using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in TBCRC's neratinib-T-DM1 cohort. Patients received neratinib (160 mg daily) and T-DM1 (3.6 mg/kg IV every 21 days). A pre-planned analysis assessed patient-reported GI toxicities during Cycles 1-4 using the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) GI Diarrhea scale, Systemic Therapy-Induced Diarrhea Assessment Tool (STIDAT), and PRO-CTCAE. Descriptive statistics and linear mixed effects models evaluated symptom trajectories over time. We evaluated agreement for PRO and clinician-reported data. Forty-four patients enrolled; all completed ≥1 PRO. GI symptom burden increased over Cycles 1-3. PROMIS scores worsened significantly by Cycle 2, with a peak mean increase of 6.62 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.67-10.59; p = 0.002) at Cycle 3. STIDAT scores also worsened by Cycle 3 (mean change 0.50; 95%CI: 0.11-0.90; p = 0.015). Based on maximum PRO-CTCAE scores, moderate-to-severe symptoms were reported by 20.5% (diarrhea), 24.4% (appetite loss), and 41.0% (constipation). Agreement between PRO-CTCAE and clinician-reported CTCAE was low (kappa <0.2) with clinicians reporting less toxicity. PROMIS and STIDAT scores were significantly correlated. This GI-focused PRO analysis highlights the value of PROs in capturing patient-experienced toxicities that impact quality of life yet are underestimated by clinicians. Incorporating PROs into clinical trials can inform supportive care and prophylactic strategies.Source: PubMed (PMID: 42501479)View Original on PubMed