A multicenter real-world study of clinical outcomes in octogenarians and older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
Researchers
Toshihiro Matsukawa, Jun Nagai, Minoru Kanaya, Junichi Hashiguchi, Shuichi Ota, Tomoyuki Saga, Makoto Ibata, Takuto Miyagishima, Yasutaka Kakinoki, Satoshi Yamamoto, Kentaro Wakasa, Toshiaki Hayashi, Katsuya Fujimoto, Tomoki Takahashi, Fumiaki Fujii, Masahiro Onozawa, Daigo Hashimoto, Takanori Teshima
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) predominantly affects older adults; however, patients aged ≥ 80 years remain underrepresented in clinical trials, and their real-world outcomes and prognostic determinants remain unclear. This multicenter retrospective cohort study (SNOWFALL: Study of Northern Outcomes With Frailty and Acute Leukemia in Late Life) used the Hokkaido Leukemia Net registry. Consecutive patients aged ≥ 80 years with newly diagnosed AML between 2020 and 2024 were analyzed. Clinical characteristics, treatments, overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and prognostic performance of a clinical-biological risk score were evaluated. A total of 154 patients (median age, 84 years) were evaluated, with a median OS of 237 days. Although unadjusted OS did not differ significantly between patients aged 80-84 years and those aged ≥ 85 years, multivariable analysis identified age ≥ 85 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥ 2, and high clinical-biological risk as independent adverse factors for OS. Increasing age and ECOG PS ≥ 2 were independently associated with 30-day mortality (odds ratios per year, 1.16 and 3.35, respectively). RFS and CIR did not differ significantly by age group. Non-relapse mortality analysis showed no significant trend toward higher NRM in patients aged ≥ 85 years and those with ECOG PS ≥ 2. In this real-world cohort, patients aged ≥ 80 years demonstrated poor outcomes. Prognosis may be more strongly associated with clinical vulnerability than with chronological age or relapse-related outcomes, highlighting the limitations of age-based risk models and the need for refined, clinically informed risk stratification and treatment strategies tailored to very elderly patients with AML.Source: PubMed (PMID: 42364291)View Original on PubMed