Effect of Electroacupuncture on Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Researchers
Lu Chen, Qianyan Liu, Lixia Pei, Hao Geng, Yongtao Liu, Zhengming Yang, Min Ding, Rongrong Shen, Min Chen, Jin Lu, Dongfang You, Xiaoliang Wu, Junling Zhou, Linyan Hu, Benjie Guo, Shuting Sun, Feiyi Chen, Zhanhao Zhao, Yining Zhai, Zhuolin Chen, Zhenan Li, Wenping Yao, Hua Feng, Chunxia Lu, Yanfang Liu, Juanjuan Shi, Jing Guo, Jianhua Sun
Abstract
Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a refractory neuropathic pain condition with limited therapeutic options. Although electroacupuncture has demonstrated potential analgesic effects, high-quality evidence from rigorous randomized clinical trials remains limited. To determine whether electroacupuncture reduces pain severity compared with sham electroacupuncture and evaluate its safety in patients with PHN. This multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial took place at 7 tertiary hospitals in China and enrolled participants from October 2020 to July 2022, with the last follow-up in September 2022. Data analyses were performed from August to December 2025. Participants with PHN aged 45 to 75 years and moderate to severe pain (11-point Numeric Rating Scale [NRS-11] score ≥4) were recruited. Of 1072 patients screened, 624 were excluded. The remaining 448 participants were randomized to electroacupuncture (n = 225) or sham electroacupuncture (n = 223); 383 participants (85.49%) completed the trial. Twenty sessions of electroacupuncture or sham electroacupuncture over 4 weeks, followed by a 4-week posttreatment follow-up. The primary outcome was the change in the NRS-11 scores from baseline to week 4, with responders defined as participants achieving a 30% or more reduction in NRS-11 scores. Of 448 participants, the mean (SD) age was 63.19 (9.26) years, 233 (52.01%) were male, and 215 were female (47.99%). At week 4, the electroacupuncture group had a greater decrease in the NRS-11 scores (-1.52) than the sham electroacupuncture group (-0.99) with an adjusted mean difference of -0.53 (95% CI, -0.61 to -0.43; P < .001), and the responder rate was significantly higher in the electroacupuncture group (46.68%) than in the sham electroacupuncture group (24.28%) (adjusted risk difference, 22.40%; 95% CI, 13.02%-31.79%; P < .001). These treatment benefits persisted through a 1-month follow-up; no clinically significant adverse events were observed. Among patients with PHN in this study, electroacupuncture provided a statistically significant reduction in pain severity, increased responder rates, and improved pain-related functional outcomes. These benefits suggest that electroacupuncture may be a useful nonpharmacological option for integrated management of PHN. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04560361.Source: PubMed (PMID: 42189557)View Original on PubMed